ozarque ([info]ozarque) wrote,
@ 2007-07-04 09:14:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Writing science fiction; interview 2
July 9, 2040

"Interview with Crandyll Vory," conducted by SF-Terra senior correspondent Elderberry Kwinn
Award-winning novelist swears he'll never write again!

Elderberry Kwinn:
First, let me congratulate you on winning both the Nebula and the Hugo awards for your debut novel, Return My Fragments In Tiny Plastic Bags Before Noon. That's quite a coup!

Crandyll Vory
Thank you.

Kwinn:
But you've issued a formal statement saying that your first novel is going to be your last, and that's going to cheat readers out of a lot of good reading. Those who loved Return My Fragments -- which includes me, by the way -- aren't happy about that. Could you explain why you've made that decision?

Vory:
Because the publishers wrecked my book, that's why! I spent nine years writing it.... nine long years ... and they wrecked it. They stole it from me and turned it into something I never intended to write -- and I will not risk having that happen to me again. It's like somebody dear to me had died; that's how much it hurts.

Kwinn:
I've read your statement, and I understand that that's how you feel -- but I have to admit, Crandyll, that I don't understand your reasons. So the publishers put a few holopops in your book; so what? All the books have holopops now, and people are crazy about them. Weren't your publishers were just doing their job?

Vory:
It's not "their job," as you put it, to decide what my characters look like and how they dress and how they move -- that's my job. And my right! All those stupid little threedy figures popping up when you turn the pages and jumping around like a bunch of fleas!

Kwinn:
But doesn't that make your book more real? More exciting?

Vory:
What it does is it makes it not my book any more! The papertechs that did the holopops didn't even bother to read my book! It says -- it says right on page 3 -- that Commander Grologg has gray hair. Thinning gray hair! And every damn time Grologg "pops up," he has a full head of thick red hair! The book says he's an old man, it says he's bent over, it says he's stiff and he's clumsy -- and then in the holopops he's a big straight husky man in his prime and he goes waltzing around like a ballet dancer, and.... Oh, lord.... I can't talk about it any more; it just makes me sick.

Kwinn:
I understand that they've apologized and offered to do a new printing that corrects all the careless mistakes, but you've turned that down. Is that right?

Vory:
For damn sure, it's right! I made it absolutely clear: If anybody wants another book from me, it has to say in the contract that there will be no holopops -- not a single damn one. No little tiny threedys popping up and turning my book into some other book I never wrote.

Kwinn:
Crandyll, you know they can't do that... Nobody today would buy a book that didn't have holopops.

Vory:
Yet another good reason for me to go into some other line of work.

Kwinn:
I think I speak for all your fans when I say that we sincerely hope you'll change your mind.

Vory:
Not a chance. I'm not going to write my heart out -- for years, mind you! -- and then have my work distorted and twisted and turned into some kind of cheap travesty. I'd rather raise chickens, or clean houses, or run a robot lot .... whatever. At least that way I could stand to look at myself in the mirror when I get up in the morning!

Kwinn:
I'm sorry you feel that way. It's a real loss to the science fiction community.

Vory:
Tough. The sf community should have better taste than to want holopops cluttering up its books and its magazines. If they can't see that ... well... I have nothing more to say to them.


(Post a new comment)

Thanks
[info]journeyrose
2007-07-04 02:30 pm UTC (link)
I love it. Thank you! Now you could do a follow up about the court transcripts when the publisher refuses to turn over royalties as the author violates his.her contract for libelling the publisher and driving down sales of all holopop books...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Thanks... response to journeyrose...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-04 03:18 pm UTC (link)
And thank you in return....

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]foomf
2007-07-04 03:03 pm UTC (link)
That's a lovely cross-extrapolation of "that creature on the cover is not my heroine" and "why did they get that idiot Cruise to play my psychologist hero in the movie?"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Response to foomf....
[info]ozarque
2007-07-04 03:18 pm UTC (link)
Thank you. And "cross-extrapolation" is a lovely word-coining, as well as a lovely concept.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nekosensei
2007-07-04 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Hey...I thought thought I'd comment and say that I've been reading your blog for a week...maybe more. That interview I read was a nice piece of writing...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Response to nekosensei...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-04 04:01 pm UTC (link)
Welcome! Thank you for your comment, and for the encouraging words.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

OT
[info]shakatany
2007-07-04 04:18 pm UTC (link)
OT have you read Ursula Leguin's response to Michael Chabon at http://www.boingboing.net/2007/07/04/ursula_leguin_rips_i.html? Vastly amusing.

Shakatany

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: OT
(Anonymous)
2007-07-04 08:20 pm UTC (link)
Now if I could just turn off the damn animations at boingboing so I could read Le Guin's piece.... :-) (My Opera toggles to 'no images' and I think I have all the 'no animations' boxes checked in options -- and they still come through.

As to the story -- I don't get this one. I agree with the author. I wouldn't buy a book with pop up animations either. I wonder why neither he nor the interviewer mentioned an option of him self-publishing his next on his own website, like he wants it? If his first book is so popular, he might make a success of a web pub.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

a copy of the text
[info]perlandria
2007-07-04 08:32 pm UTC (link)
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
Ursula LeGuin rips into Slate Magazine

Science fiction great Ursula LeGuin took great exception to Slate magazine's statement that "Michael Chabon has spent considerable energy trying to drag the decaying corpse of genre fiction out of the shallow grave where writers of serious literature abandoned it." So so wrote this:

Something woke her in the night. Was it steps she heard, coming up the stairs -- somebody in wet training shoes, climbing the stairs very slowly ... but who? And why wet shoes? It hadn't rained. There, again, the heavy, soggy sound. But it hadn't rained for weeks, it was only sultry, the air close, with a cloying hint of mildew or rot, sweet rot, like very old finiocchiona, or perhaps liverwurst gone green. There, again -- the slow, squelching, sucking steps, and the foul smell was stronger. Something was climbing her stairs, coming closer to her door. As she heard the click of heel bones that had broken through rotting flesh, she knew what it was. But it was dead, dead! God damn that Chabon, dragging it out of the grave where she and the other serious writers had buried it to save serious literature from its polluting touch, the horror of its blank, pustular face, the lifeless, meaningless glare of its decaying eyes! What did the fool think he was doing? Had he paid no attention at all to the endless rituals of the serious writers and their serious critics -- the formal expulsion ceremonies, the repeated anathemata, the stakes driven over and over through the heart, the vitriolic sneers, the endless, solemn dances on the grave? Did he not want to preserve the virginity of Yaddo? Had he not even understand the importance of the distinction between sci fi and counterfactual fiction? Could he not see that Cormac McCarthy -- although everything in his book (except the wonderfully blatant use of an egregiously obscure vocabulary) was remarkably similar to a great many earlier works of science fiction about men crossing the country after a holocaust -- could never under any circumstances be said to be a sci fi writer, because Cormac McCarthy was a serious writer and so by definition incapable of lowering himself to commit genre? Could it be that that Chabon, just because some mad fools gave him a Pulitzer, had forgotten the sacred value of the word mainstream? No, she would not look at the thing that had squelched its way into her bedroom and stood over her, reeking of rocket fuel and kryptonite, creaking like an old mansion on the moors in a wuthering wind, its brain rotting like a pear from within, dripping little grey cells through its ears. But its call on her attention was, somehow, imperative, and as it stretched out its hand to her she saw on one of the half-putrefied fingers a fiery golden ring. She moaned. How could they have buried it in such a shallow grave and then just walked away, abandoning it? "Dig it deeper, dig it deeper!" she had screamed, but they hadn't listened to her, and now where were they, all the other serious writers and critics, when she needed them? Where was her copy of Ulysses? All she had on her bedside table was a Philip Roth novel she had been using to prop up the reading lamp. She pulled the slender volume free and raised it up between her and the ghastly golem -- but it was not enough. Not even Roth could save her. The monster laid its squamous hand on her, and the ring branded her like a burning coal. Genre breathed its corpse-breath in her face, and she was lost. She was defiled. She might as well be dead. She would never, ever get invited to write for Granta now.

Link


posted by Cory Doctorow at 06:20:16 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: a copy of the text
[info]houseboatonstyx
2007-07-04 08:50 pm UTC (link)
Oh, thanks!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: OT
(Anonymous)
2007-07-04 08:28 pm UTC (link)
Now if I could just turn off the damn animations at boingboing so I could read Le Guin's piece.... :-) (My Opera toggles to 'no images' and I think I have all the 'no animations' boxes checked in options -- and they still come through.)

As to Ozarque's story today -- I don't get this one. I agree with the author. I wouldn't buy a book with pop up animations either. I wonder why neither he nor the interviewer mentioned an option of him self-publishing his next on his own website, like he wants it? If his first book is so popular, he might make a success of a web pub.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: OT... response to shakatany...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-04 09:12 pm UTC (link)
I saw it in .... I think in Ansible ... earlier today, and thought it was excellent. But I might very well not have seen it, and I would have been sorry to miss it. Thank you for posting the link.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-07-04 04:35 pm UTC (link)
This is wonderful... perfect... thank you. It does hurt to see individuality killed, or lie down and die. This interview is especially timely now, with the usurious proposed royalty rates for webcasters. The little guys are giving up. And the beat goes on.

Meg Umans

(Reply to this)


[info]babalon_it
2007-07-04 04:40 pm UTC (link)
I absolutely love these interviews!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Response to babalon_it...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-04 09:12 pm UTC (link)
Many thanks...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hagsrus
2007-07-04 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Holopops? Wow, am I behind the times -- first I've ever heard of them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]foomf
2007-07-04 05:03 pm UTC (link)
You must not be shopping at Borders-N-Nobles or TarWalJayMart.


Which is positively unconsumerist. Don't you know how much DRM you're illegally defeating by reading flatpaper?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]archangelbeth
2007-07-04 05:14 pm UTC (link)
Oh, that is a lovely bit of microfic, right there, foomf.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]archangelbeth
2007-07-04 05:13 pm UTC (link)
*chuckle*

Really, Vory, self-publishing might be an option!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]elynne
2007-07-04 06:07 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, but then he'd have to deal with those wacky "reconstructionist" archaic bookprinters, who would want to grind all the paper by hand from plant fibers. They'd probably leave out all the microfilaments - even the sales-movement tracking ID in the spine, and the BookSmartMark - good lord, how would people remember what page they were on without BSM? Use more shredded plant fibers? I've heard that the only way they can get decent quality plant fibers these days is to grow their own papyrus... in the Olden Days, they actually made books from trees!

Of course, he could always invest in a small nest of fibre-spiders, and try weaving his own microfilament books, but that's a pretty hefty initial outlay - he'd need the despised royalties from his first book to do that. But I'd bet money that the writing bug has bitten him good and hard, and no matter what he says, or what he does for a living, he'll keep on writing. It takes some people that way. If he's serious about not ever letting his writing be published again, though, he'd better spend some money on an EnforcementBot with strict instructions to flash-sear everything after his death... the final copyright protection for any artist.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]archangelbeth
2007-07-04 11:59 pm UTC (link)
On a totally skew track... Is it just me and my own set of biases, or does the "nine years writing this" make anyone else think that Vory is a pretentious ahr-teest who wouldn't have written anything else anyway, and what he did write is probably pretentious dreck? And that it's entirely possible that Vory is pitching a fit because now he can get attention and never have to write another word, but return to the glories of talking about writing without actually having to string a plot together?

(I'm not saying that I'm real talent or anything so hubristic... But I did crank out around 400K words with a beginning, middle, and end, and have entertained at least half a dozen people besides myself, in the past 9 months, give or take a few weeks. Perhaps I am spoiled by having enough time to devote to that, rather than having a "real job" to eat time and energy; Vory says nothing about what day-job he's been holding down while writing -- just that the writing took Nine! Long! Years!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wolfangel78
2007-07-05 08:14 pm UTC (link)
I read it and thought, well, I'm just as glad not to be reading anything else by this Vody. "How dare my readers not want the kind of books I want to write! I'll just take my toys and go home SO THERE."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ethesis
2007-07-10 04:18 am UTC (link)
Yes, indeed, that was what I got.

I love these short stories, btw.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]artfulruin
2007-07-05 12:31 am UTC (link)
Lovely. Yes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Repsonse to artfulruin...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-06 04:34 pm UTC (link)
Thank you...

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Oops...
[info]ozarque
2007-07-06 04:35 pm UTC (link)
I do know how to spell "response" ... I really do. Sorry about that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…