ozarque ([info]ozarque) wrote,
@ 2007-01-26 08:27:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
The role of public libraries; recommended links...
Thanks to [info]idiotgrrl for sending me a print copy of Wade Roush's 2005 article, "The Infinite Library: Does Google's plan to digitize millions of print books spell the death of libraries; or their rebirth?", which is also online, at http://www.techreview.com/Infotech/14408/ . Here's a sample, from page 56:

"Publishers and authors count on strict copyright laws to prevent copying and reuse of their intellectual property until after they've recouped their investments. But libraries, which allow many readers to use the same book, have always enjoyed something of an exemption from copyright laws. Now the mass digitization of library books threatens to make their content just as portable -- or piracy prone, depending on one's point of view -- as digital music. And that directly involves libraries in the clash between big media companies and those who would like all information to be free -- or at least as cheap as possible. Whatever happens, transforming millions more books into bits is sure to change the habits of library patrons. What, then, will become of libraries themselves?"

Also online, from the Krafty Librarian, is a post about a 2006 special issue of Internet Reference Services Quarterly on the library/Google relationship and interaction, at http://kraftylibrarian.blogspot.com/2006/09/libraries-and-google.html#comments . This post has the complete table of contents for the issue, with links to the articles. [The links (unless you're a subscriber or purchaser) take you to abstracts rather than full texts; no abstract is available for the introduction.]

And a bit farther afield, for those who are deeply interested in the subject, there's George R. Plosker's 2003 article, "The Information Industry Revolution: Implications for Librarians," at http://www.infotoday.com/online/nov03/plosker.shtml .


(Post a new comment)


[info]dargie
2007-01-26 05:04 pm UTC (link)
Given the erosion of our libraries (at least in the Chicago area) I'd say that anything which allows us access to something more than self-help, wedding planning and children's books is a good thing. The library closest to me has one case of "classics." Fiction usually consists of the latest Tom Clancy, Dan Brown, Stephen King, etc. And while there's nothing wrong with stocking them, I have to wonder where we need to go to find something less mainstream.

That said, I have to say also that I prefer an actual book to a digital download. But between having and not having? Thank you, I'll take the download.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Response to dargie...
[info]ozarque
2007-01-26 06:03 pm UTC (link)
Understood -- and I think you're right. I just wish I had more confidence in the claims that soon "everyone" will be able to afford access to the Internet. One person's "pocket money" or "no more than what you'd spend on a latte at Starbuck's" can be the only money another person has for food or medicine or shelter. And not everybody has a way to get to a library (or other free Internet access location); not everybody is physically able to get there. I worry about the Digital Divide.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Response to dargie...
[info]dargie
2007-01-26 06:49 pm UTC (link)
I worry about the Digital Divide. As I do. But I tend to think of literature as an endangered species. Even if I have no access to it, I'd prefer to know that it exists somewhere.

And I worry a good deal about those who do have both money and access, but simply don't care to use resources like their local library, bookstores, or Project Gutenberg. I do, to some degree, believe that if you want education badly enough, you will find a way. But I don't know that there's any way around willful ignorance.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]memegarden
2007-01-26 07:13 pm UTC (link)
Your first link doesn't work for me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Response to memegarden...
[info]ozarque
2007-01-26 08:52 pm UTC (link)
I'm sorry -- and I'm puzzled. I just clicked on it to check, and it goes straight to the article for me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-01-27 03:51 pm UTC (link)
This is a discussion that has been going on in librarian professional circles for years. The sky is hardly falling.

If your primary concept of "library" is "building full of books, staffed by poorly paid public servants", then yes, that concept is changing. Public libraries are attempting to redefine themselves as a sense of place; as much a community center as a repository for information.

That's not all a library is. I am a librarian [0] without a library. I do reference work for my employer, a governmental agency. I manage, maintain, and develop content for our suite of websites, which are intended to educate the public about what we do. I provide access to continuing education materials for our staff. I teach research skills.

Librarians do more than check out books and put them back on the shelves when they are done. Most of what I learned in my master's program was how to locate sources of information, evaluate those sources for appropriateness and utility, organize that information so that it can be acccessed and managed, and repackage it to suit the needs of my client. Mass digitization of primary sources would make my job easier, not harder; and my clients, who don't have the time or desire to learn the skills I have, would still need me.

Aspen

[0] Yup, just got my MLS diploma in the mail yesterday.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…